From The Editor:
Updated 08/22/2009 at 9:30 p.m.
I debated for 24 hours whether or not to publish this. Frankly, I like the Washoe County Sheriff, but I'm not at all impressed with the Civil Reserve Deputies. They're like a boil on my ass needing popped in a big, bad way, because I don't believe what I'm seeing out of these "Civilians" in contrast to the professionalism that I've experienced from the Academy-trained personnel of the Washoe County Sheriff's Active Duty Deputies.
I'm wondering if we wouldn't all be better if they just dispanded the Civil Reserve Deputies and took the cost savings and invested those monies in in more, Academy trained Deputy Sheriffs.
I mean, I had a helluva time just filing the complaint while Civil Reserve Deputies gave me a going over as to "why would you want to file a complaint over this!?"
I guess a more "appropriate response" from Civil Reserve Deputies might lend a clue as to my motives. Presently, every positive thing coming from the Washoe County Sheriff has come from Academy trained people, while every negative thing that I've personally observed since my return to Reno in 2008, has come from these Civil Reserve Deputy types.
Which raises the question: which is more valuable:
An Academy Trained Sheriff's Deputy, or a Civil Reserve Deputy.
You may as well ask the question: "How many Civil Reserve Deputies does it take to change a Light Bulb!?"
Answer: A half-dozen Civil Reserve Deputies standing and/or sitting in the dark, asking the stupid question, over and over again of someone seeking the Light of Truth:
"Why would you want to change the light bulb!?"
Answer: Because I'm not the only one "burned out" from listening to the stupid question of Civil Reserve Deputies.
The time you spend wasting my time with stupid questions designed to avoid doing the job at hand, the job can be done in half the time. So why ask stupid questions!?!?
Answer: "We're Civil Reserve Deputies!"
I feel VERY bad for the Washoe County Sheriff and his Academy Trained professionals for having to write this, but Sheriff ~ you need to seriously get control of those Civilian Sheriff "Wannabes" and give them a proper, attitude adjustment.
They are detracting from the integrity of your overall unit.
Anyhow, this is the log I wrote immediately after receiving the phone call detailed (in white) below. I'm pissed, and let there be no "ifs, ands or buts" about it.
We're approaching nine months since the Stalking incident of December 1, 2008, and they finally contacted one of the owners of the vehicles ~ the one with the "Reno Air Race" license plate ~ confirmed who owned it while the other's owner still hasn't been contacted as to whom was driving that vehicle.
Here's the kicker:
According to "Trudy," a Supervisor with the Washoe County Sheriff's Civil Reserve Deputies, Internal Affairs at the Sheriff's Department assigned the investigation to her. They're not involved, according to "Trudy."
"They handed it to me."
Trudy calls me up but doesn't identify whom she is ~ not until the end of the call. Not IAD, but rather, a Supervisor of these Civil Reserve Deputies. In particular, she's the Supervisor of the Civil Reserve Deputy who failed to perform his duties in an appropriate manner.
How stealthy and clandestine can one get in dealing with the Public, and for that matter, the Press? That you don't Truthfully inform the person whom you are calling...
...just whom it is that you are.
Even the Washoe County Sheriff's Academy Trained Deputy announces just whom the hell he is before kicking down the door. Makes it a point to, because Criminals fear him and pee their pants into submission, the moment he "introduces" himself.
Which points out the problem with the Civil Reserve Deputies. If Criminals are to fear them, or honest People are to respect them, shouldn't they announce whom they are at the beginning with an introduction!?
A "Proper" introduction!?
If you're trying to fly under my radar, then I've got to figure that you're trying to fly under the Sheriff's!
At the time, when the call has reached a point that it should be ending, she starts defending her subordinate. Almost like a Judge handing you a decision well before the hearing is over.
Well, why not, on the other hand ~ being that she is "his" Superior (in every way, I might add...) and since as everyone knows, if her subordinate has screwed up, then so too, has she.
So of course she would want to defend him, because in the end, "Trudy" is responsible for Civil Reserve Deputy Smith.
Cover your subordinate's ass ~ Cover your own in the process!
That's how it works.
Good policy, I should think...
...except that, here's how it's supposed to work:
You want to be a Civil Reserve Deputy for the Washoe County Sheriff!?
Then your Standards of Conduct and Ethics must be as high, if not higher, than the Academy trained professional Law Enforcement Officer that the Sheriff's Deputy represents.
Otherwise, take off your uniform, hand it to someone who will exemplify what a trained Sheriff's Deputy represents, and don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out!!!
As a Civil Reserve Deputy, your misconduct, in any form, makes complete asses out of guys and gals whom are Professionals! Not to mention, what it does to Civil Reserve Deputies whom are trying and actually doing the job right. Those guys and gals on YOUR left and right!
Your GOOD conduct maintains the integrity of the entire organization that is the Washoe County Sheriff's Office, and a good one it is. I've watched them for years ~ for too long ~ and if there were crown jewels that people could point to and admire in the history of this very corrupt State of Nevada, the Washoe County Sheriff can be pointed to, admired and stands in dissent with all corruption in the State.
Until, at this point in time, you come across the Civil Reserve types that I have since September, 2008.
One year.
For the IAD to assign an Internal Affairs investigation to a person with a conflict of interest in this case ~ "Trudy" being "Smith's" Supervisor ~ is unbelievable.
Literally, I don't believe it. Frankly, I think we have another Civil Reserve Loose Cannon here, so I've attempted to contact the Victim's Advocate's office for assistance. Did not get a call back. Oh well...
...I have my own ass to cover these days and this is getting ridiculous:
This is a TRAINING issue!
This should not become a head-hunting issue!
Identify the problem, admit to it, and you have all you need at that point, to fix it once and for all ~ for the better!
"Trudy" had to have been contacted by someone in regards to this "IAD investigation." I'm going to want to know whom and whether or not "Trudy" is telling the Truth. I have my own opinion of things at the moment.
In the course of defending Civil Reserve Deputy Smith, Trudy tried to entrap me with contrived questions and for pressured answers that I didn't fall for.
Smith didn't do his job. Smith stood in my living room and told me the complaint was going to be closed without investigation. Smith treated myself and my witness rudely.
I don't need his head for that ~ I need him in compliance with the Law. Why waste the man over one mistake or even a series of mistakes involving two incidents of Stalking!? Why waste the money spent on his training. A quick verbal and its fixed. "Don't do it again ~ follow the procedures correctly the next time. No more problem!"
Considering the nonsense that went on between "Trudy," "Smith" and that Civil Reserve Deputy at Silver Knolls, in 2007 ~ 2008, I believe there are issues of "Cultural Mindset" in the Civil Reserve Deputies Program that one of these days ~ perhaps right now ~ are going to prove detrimental to the Washoe County Sheriff's Office.
I'm pretty much fed up! I'd hoped there would be at least one bastion for Law & Order in this State, and from what I was seeing, I thought it would be the Washoe County Sheriff.
I guess I'm going to have to wait for the outcome of the "investigation" to know for sure, but tonight, I am that close to abadoning all faith in the Law & the Courts in Nevada, and wondering whether or not the Second Amendment is the better choice of Amendments to pursue when seeking a "Redress of Grievances" against not only the Criminal element, but those in Law & the Courts that support them because it pays Cops, Attorneys and Judges, to do so...
...above and beyond what Honest Citizens are paying them to represent "The Honest Citizen," and NOT the Criminal!
The thing about the First Amendment is this: utilize the First Amendment, and you have all those other Amendments in support of you, with the Second Amendment left as a last resort.
However, if they in Law & the Courts use the Color of Authority of their Uniforms to violate your Civil Rights, the First and all those other Amendments are worthless from the start, leaving you only the Second Amendment and the Ninth with which to interpret its use.
If you ever have to go "Second Amendment" on anything, then the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights have failed you, because why would you pick up the gun, the ammo, the explosives, to try and regain your Civil Rights otherwise?
It means your Country has been overthrown.
Choose wisely, choose carefully, before you think yourself the "Right Hand of God."
~~~~~~~~~~
"Do not think yourself a good man;that thought may spoil you."
~ from "Ride With The Devil"by Daniel Woodrell
~~~~~~~~~~
Well, the Country hasn't been overthrown. Certainly, the State of Nevada has by its "Elected Representatives," the Courts, the Law, the Attorneys and the ones behind all of these creeps with the money and power to back them, the "Corporations."
There are but a few good Judges in this State. After my encounter with Judge Howard, by word of mouth ~ described as "a good Judge" ~ I now know otherwise so now there is one less. And the pickin's were mighty slim at the start.
This is apparently a man who is trying to get even for the "Great African Diaspora" that continues, in excess of 500 years, by equating the term "Equality" to the right to make STUPID, inhumane, indecent decisions as so many "White Judges" before him, resulting in decisions that are acts that can be declared, not so much in terms of "Reverse Racism," but rather, and due to the nature and character ~ or lack thereof ~ in regards to Judge Howard, "Waste, Fraud and Abuse."
Judge Howard, we handed you robes of honor to wear with dignity, to render decisions nobly in our lives. You said "Give me a chance to prove myself!"
We did.
You failed.
You are not whom you said you are and would be on the Bench.
Violating People's Civil Rights are not what Judge's robes are for. Nor for that matter, all those Law books you ignored.
Give the robes back, so that we can give them to someone who gives a damn about Honest Citizens and won't bow to Corporate and/or Money pressures. Won't violate someone's Civil Rights because it pays to do so.
Give the robes back so that we can give them to someone who will do the job that you failed to do during my arraignment on August 6, 2009. And no doubt, have done to others when the call came from the smoke-filled Boardroom.
They'll (RARA, Reno P.D., City Attorney) roust me into jail and then into Court, using a local "Misdemeanor Trespass" charge to Trump the First Amendment, and do so at the moment they (RARA) say the crime is committed, and here I am, filing not one, but two stalking complaints on the same day, within hours of each other, and almost nine months later, they still haven't contacted one of the owners of the two vehicles involved; they only contacted the first this week; IAD allegedly hands the matter for investigation over to the person responsible for the Civil Reserve Deputy who was deficient in the performance of his duty; that person has a Conflict of Interest in the matter being his Supervisor, resulting in a Standards of Conduct (Ethics) violation; no one has been put in jail; no one has been arraigned, in the half-assed manner that Judge Ken Howard arraigned me on August 6, 2009, denying me counsel while lying that a Misdemeanor Charge ~ which warrants six months in jail ~ "does not rise to the level" of a jailable offense, therefore, the Court is not required to assign me Counsel, something that ~ in the two months before he uttered that very statement ~ an Attorney told me that "any Judge" that did not issue me a "Public Defender in this matter was going to be in Big Trouble."
That Attorney is standing by for my retainer in order to take on the Federal issues involving this case.
Somewhere, in regards to Judge Howard's lies, Martin Luther King Jr. is spinning in his grave tonight, like a lathe. For after all the tribulations of the Civil Rights movement and the days that have passed since, to include countless lynchings, murders, assassinations, bombings and in particular ~ the brutal killing of three Civil Rights Workers visiting the South to register voters; the act made famous in the movie "Mississippi Burning" ~ an African American Judge is going to sit on the Bench and lie to deny any citizen their Civil Rights under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments...
...shows just how F~~KING futile it is to try and exercise your Civil Rights in the State of Nevada, United States of America, when those who sit in Judgment ignore the Law and make Sovereigns of themselves in doing so, over the lives of countless others.
Frankly, it shows that as a Society, we are regressing at a rapid pace into the past.
I don't know what that arraignment was, but I figure it was 1) Judge Howard's version of a Drive-by, or 2) Judge Howard's version of a Lynching, or 3) Judge Howard's version of equality, except that he's equal to the Rich and Powerful so,
"Mr. Daniels! SUCKS TO BE YOU!"
One thing it SURE AS HELL WAS is simply this:
Civil Rights "Advancing to the Rear!"
To put it very bluntly, these Corporate fools and their lap dog Judges aren't just asking for a bloodbath...
...they're begging for one.
The People will not continue to tolerate this. An inferno can start with a simple match.
This I understand.
Satchell Paige said it best:
"Be careful what you wish...
...you might get it."
Whole Wars that our soldiers are dying in are based at this moment on these words:
"Inequitable, unevenhanded Justice," or, more simply put:
"Injustice."
The battle cry has been rising up for some time:
"No Justice, No Peace."
Why, though, should it come to violence, when we can simply vote these fools out and use our own votes more wisely in the future!?
Definitely time to vote these bums out, remove them by force of Law if necessary, but more importantly, Judge them by their "efforts" and in deciding whether or not to remove them, Judge them as they would and have been Judging all of you, Nevada.
Before somebody loses their head. Before somebody gets stupid.
REALLY stupid!
If anyone is to lose their heads, let it be the Criminals, not the Common Man. Let it be at the hands of good, decent, honest, Law Enforcement, and uncorruptable Judges, which I firmly believe the Law, the Courts, and the Washoe County Sheriff represent, even if his (the latter's) Civil Reserve Deputies no longer do.
And that's a big if...
I still believe, in my heart of hearts, that there are Civil Reserve Deputies trying to do their jobs, that have to bite their tongues to keep from screaming at those sharing and wearing "the uniform," that aren't doing the job properly and are causing the Good Cop to take the heat from guys like me.
We'll see what the Sheriff does. We'll see what Internal Affairs at the Washoe County Sheriff does in the end. Whether or not they truly handed this matter over to "Trudy," or if she was calling with a song and a dance to trick her potential victims into giving up hope and closing the case.
That s~~t don't work with me...
...and I told her so.
There is no such thing as a "Bad Cop."
There is no such thing as a "Corrupt Cop."
There are only Good Cops.
All others are imposters ~ Criminals posing in and hiding behind the "Color of Authority," which is mostly represented by their uniforms and badges, along with the guns they carry and the accoutrements of the Law Enforcement office(r), such as the K-9 Officer, the Patrol Car, even the bicycle.
The same goes for Judges and Attorneys.
My job is to walk a Gauntlet in order to find out from among them, "whom is whom."
Good Cop, Good Attorney, Good Judge...
...or Criminal hiding behind a facade of "Justice." Hiding behind the Color of Authority of Corporate Office, Political Office, Robes of Court and/or Uniform and Badge.
Yes, "Corporate Office." Mike Houghton is President & CEO of the Reno Air Races. He occupies not one, but two "Corporate Offices." Such Offices make "Public Figures" and are considered "Leadership Positions," beyond being Management positions. They come with Great power and "with Great power, comes Great responsibility," according to Sir Thomas Moore, in "Utopia."
The same is true of the Corporations I've had to report on and expose, including and in particular, the Mobsters hiding behind the facade of the:
"Reno Air Race Association..."
...and others whom have been supporting them.
I think there's problems in the Washoe County Sheriff's Civil Reserve Deputies Program, and that it's time to fight for a better, more Professional "militia" in support of the Sheriff, and if that isn't the Civil Reserve Deputy, then "AMF!"
"Adios Mutha F~~kers!"
Say goodbye to all of them. Find a better solution to the problem than those who are going to take advantage of others, abuse, support the rich and powerful in the criminal element, profit by it, and leave the common citizen hanging.
Literally, "by their necks until dead" is how they would leave us.
Time for change. I'm going to continue to fight for my causes. And if the First Amendment doesn't work, then I'll just move onto the next one, because after the Second Amendment is employed, all those other Amendments really won't matter until such time as we take this State and this Country back from the Criminals and the Corrupt in the Law & the Courts, whom are deliberately aiding and abetting crime, and with Malice Aforethought directed against the People...
...the very People that the "Powers That Be" are supposed to be representing. Elected or Appointed, doesn't matter. Honesty and Integrity are what matter.
But just remember, when I exercise the First Amendment, I'm exercising all Civil Rights but the Second Amendment, and only those that are applicable to "The Cause."
Remember that old saying: "Real Men Don't Eat Quiche!"
Try this on for size, especially you in the Washoe County Civil Reserve Deputies Corps:
"Real Men and Real Women Don't Espouse What Real Mean and Real Women do or don't do...
...they set the example, and then they lead by example!"
And, for the record, I love Quiche...
...but I'll only suggest you try it at least once before making up your minds.
Yeah, such a damned shame when the People empowered to make such decision regarding the jailing of "the accused," belong in prison far more than "the accused" themselves.
Like I said, or considering how I'm presently Editing this piece, may have yet to say
There is another possible source for Redress in the Washoe County Sheriff's Department. I will contact that individual on Monday. However, at this point in time, with the filing of Federal Complaints approaching, my plate is absolutely full and I don't have time for any more of the Criminal element's diversions.
As for "Trudy" and her nonsensical bulls~~t...
Trudy, the person you referred to as a "Realtor," might indeed, hold that title. But no property was for sale nor was associated with any property while he sat on his perch on a road looking down on my home, watching the movements of my friends, my family and myself, from his RARA marked and infested vehicle.
As for the woman, I have positively identified her and now reveal her identity:
Valerie Enos Miller, the same individual whom ~ along with Michael J. Houghton and Wayne Sagar ~ threatened Ron Buccarelli, Unlimited Class Pilot, and his Team, that if he didn't end his association with me, he would be disinvited from the Air Races of 2007.
Just like John Parker was "disinvited" back in 2003.
The "Reno National Championship Invitational Death For Entertainment Only 'Come Out and See the Crashes' before the 'IT' Does Hit the Fan Air Races..."
Conspiracy, Racketeering, Civil Rights violations and now we can add "Stalking," to Ms. Miller's charges. And as for the Federal complaint dismissed by Judge Brian Sandoval, in regards to the Conspiracy, Racketeering and Civil Rights violations, you'd better believe...
...that issue isn't dead because of misconduct by Judge Sandoval.
And that was a "Civil Complaint," I'm still formulating the overall Federal Criminal Complaint, and all their actions will be included in that, including Judge Sandoval's with his own Conflicts of Interest.
That clown isn't going to make it to the Governor's Office. He'll be lucky if he and his buddy State Senator William J. "The Kingpin" Raggio, get to see the "Warden's Office" once they're both dropped off at a Federal prison.
Your boy didn't do his job, Trudy, and now, you've botched this matter even worse.
Just the same, my witness awaits your call. She's home, has been home all along while ill, may have been outside when the phone rang, looking after her pets, but let's all remember:
Her phone only rang once and no one knows just yet, if it was actually you calling.
Perhaps you should call back.
She's been advised as to how you "conduct" your calls. You won't want to try and make those same "mistakes" twice.
Good luck with all your alibis, excuses and "Plausible Deniabilities," Trudy. Thank you for your defense of the Criminal element and leaving honest citizens to hang in the wind out there in rural Nevada!
Nearly nine months of delays caused by your Deputy, and now you, wipe them all out (the alibis, etc.). The alibis, the excuses, worthless. No "Plausible Deniability" this time. No airplanes were flying for him to watch. No land was for sale. If there had been home for sale, he wouldn't have been parked away from it, he would have been at the home, in the driveway, where the "For Sale" sign that wasn't there would have been conspicuously posted.
You blew it, Trudy!
And you're the experienced Supervisor. Smith is a training issue...
...what's your excuse, "Judge Trudy!?"
Too bad you can't be more honest, seeing as how the Proof of your Dishonesty was the fact that you did not properly inform me of whom you were in the moment after I first answered the phone.
Compounded by the fact that you couldn't pressure the answers that favored you and Smith.
Well, here's another rant for the (Guiness) record books.
Excuse me, now, while I go get some sleep, and not bother to give a damn about either of you, until I've gotten the formal results from whomever it is that's not investigating this matter properly...
...or in fact, are, and aren't going to be too happy to find out what you pulled behind their backs and without their knowledge, consent and authority.
I wonder who's going to be hanging in the wind on Monday?
~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ Mark S. "Bear" DanielsPublisher & EditorSilver State News Service
~~~~~~~~~~~~
ILIPS Group Complaint Log
Washoe County Sheriff Internal Affairs Apparently Assigns IAD Complaint (Citizen's Complaint) to Civil Reserve Deputy's Supervisor. IAD not investigating.
Latest Conflict of Interest and Ethics Issue to Develop Inside Washoe County Sheriff's Department.
RENO, NV ~ (ILIPS Group) ~ August 20, 2009 ~ The following conversation (handwritten log and notes, written immediately after the call by the Editor) took place between myself and a Washoe County Civil Reserve Sheriff's Supervisor, only identified as "Trudy," today at 3:29 p.m., August 20, 2009:
Spoke with "Trudy," who is not a Deputy Sheriff but a Civil Reserve Deputy and supervisor to Eric Smith, the Deputy called out on a stalking call.
She did not impart the knowledge of the information as to whom she was until the very end of the call, this after trying to defend the conduct of her subordinate.
I told her this was a training issue.
She indicated that stalking was a Misdemeanor that does not go to the detectives.
She indicated the Reno Air Race license plate was owned by a Realtor who claimed to be looking at a house for sale.
I informed her that to the best of my knowledge and recollection that there was no house for sale in that area at that time, and that the driver was not parked up in front of the house, but up the road where he had perfect line of sight as to what my family and my house were doing.
She thought the "Realtor" was the one with the camera.
I corrected that.
She indicated she was not able to contact the owner of the other vehicle driven by the woman, Valerie Enos Miller (my I.D.).
According to Trudy, the vehicle driven by Miller was owned by a young man.
She tried to defend them as having a right on a public street to observe.
I informed her that "Licensed Private Investigators" are trained for that job, checked out by the Police, and are better equipped to observe.
I mentioned the dangers of private citizens doing such work.
Miller pointed a camera out the window that could have been mistaken for a gun.
I told her that with my having 37 years experience as a journalist, I was able to easily identify the item as a camera and not a gun.
She repeatedly tried to get her argument across that either the observers had the right to be there or that her Civil Reserve subordinate had told me that he was going to close the case, and that I confirmed.
She was not yelling but was terse, not rude in her comments.
However, she was on the defensive the moment she tried to argue "her side/his side/their side" of these cases.
I forgot to mention the fact that the Officer had also done the same thing in the presence of myself and my witness.
I gave her a rather full history of my dispute with RARA and that controversies existed between us.
I informed her of my arrest in relation to these issues and the fact that I'm a First Amendment protected Journalist who does business on Stead Airport, and has every right to be there to report on and expose crime.
I asked her what IAD was doing about this since I had filed my complaint with them.
Trudy indicated that they had assigned the case to her.
When I asked her if I should expect contact from them or if they're going to do anything about this, she said: they assigned the case to me.
I told her I thought this was inappropriate.
She and I talked about the Deputy and his rudeness.
I mentioned that he had treated me like a nuissance caller when one week earlier, an Academy trained Sheriff's Deputy had been out to the house on a possible prowler call, wherein a truck had pulled into the driveway and sat for a while, shining its lights on myself and the house, and that the Deputy Sheriff had indicated I was doing the right thing by making these calls if I had any suspicions or any doubts.
I did confirm that the stalking had ended to best of my knowledge, information and belief.
She tried to defend dismissal of the complaint based on the fact the stalking was a one time incident for both parties.
I had to point out that the incidents occurred on the same day (within hours of each other) and that fact was on the report.
Notes:My concerns at this point are that we have a Supervisor now positioned to cover up for her subordinate and trying to argue the criminal's position, as opposed to investigating a crime.
She indicated repeatedly "You don't know if he did that or not."
I said yes I do, because it was not in his report what we (myself and my witness said) and she and I argued this point more than once. Twice to three times.
This is a complaint to IAD and one of the responsibile parties has this case assigned to them and is investigating it themselves, as opposed to an independent IAD investigation?
That is the issue. Conflict of Interest.
A person whose subordinate is under investigation should not be the investigating officer. She can conduct her own investigation, by not acting on behalf of what is supposed to be an independent IAD.
Totally inappropriate!
And they're still trying to sweep the issue under the rug, almost nine months later.
And today is the first I hear from anyone about this complaint, especially after having to go to the Victim's Advocate.
I checked the return phone number and "I6tg" or "J6tg" was referenced as the number that called. That number corresponded to 322-9910. The call was 20 minutes and 52 seconds according to the phone and took place at 3:29 p.m.
I called my witness and she has been at home but did miss an earlier call.
She has recently been ill.As opposed to this being a training issue, I now firmly believe that based on issues involving the overzealous Civil Reserve Deputy at Silver Knolls in 2008, followed by Civil Reserve Deputy Smith performing his job in an inappropriate manner, that the problem is no longer a training issue but an existing "culture and mentality" in the Washoe County Sheriff's Civil Reserve Deputy Program that is detrimental to the Washoe County Sheriff.
If true, that Internal Affairs did indeed assign the overall case ~ as indicated by and to "Trudy," Smith's Supervisor, then problem goes directly to the Washoe County Sheriff and its overall operations.I find it hard to believe that Internal Affairs assigned this case with conflict of interest to the Civil Reserve Deputy's Supervisor, and per Shakespeare, "something is rotten in Denmark."
I'm wondering if the Civil Reserve Deputy is now joined by his Supervisor, who bears responsibility for his conduct and training, as "loose cannons," along with other such individuals, in the Civil Reserve Deputy's program.Again, when I had filed this complaint originally, I was given the "Sixth Degree" by other Washoe County Civil Reserve Deputys operating at the information desk.
They were very defensive of the Deputy and appeared to be trying to intimidate me into not filing the complaint.
I forced the issue and filed.
please keep sharing of knowledges with us.Thanks a lot for your great posting.
ReplyDeletemassachusetts criminal defense attorney